![]() RELATED: Meet the scariest Republican candidates of 2022: It wasn't easy to pick 'em He was introduced as a man who's "been addicted to drugs, imprisoned, and totally hopeless" before a "miracle came" and he became a small business owner "on a mission to help others break free from addiction." Ulibarri used his rally speech to rail against "liberal policies that are destroying our country" and a laundry list of conservative culture war issues while touting his nonprofit work helping teenagers become "soldiers for Christ." Ulibarri spoke at Lake's "Stand for Freedom" rally in Scottsdale last July, the first rally of her campaign. ![]() She's also hit the campaign trail multiple times with a convicted felon who was accused by the Justice Department (DOJ) of trying to kill an FBI informant.Īccording to a finance report recently amended by Lake's campaign, the former TV news anchor who has repeatedly echoed Trump's election lies paid $2,000 to Kenneth Ulibarri, a repeat violent offender who pleaded guilty after the DOJ accused him of trying to hire a hitman to kill an FBI informant and an unrelated state charge of battery on a peace officer. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.Donald Trump's pick to be the next governor of Arizona, Kari Lake, a former local television reporter with no political experience, praises cops, touts "back the blue" on her campaign website and vows to increase resources to tackle violent criminals. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. Used Informant to Investigate Russia Ties to Campaign, Not to Spy, as Trump Claims.” The Times followed suit in a story headlined “F.B.I. It also displays a shocking ignorance of the devastating consequences to our national security. Accusations that the FBI was “spying” on the Trump campaign - rather than spying on foreign spies, which is its job - erase the important distinctions between counterintelligence and criminal investigations. Rangappa concludes: “Ironically, the FBI’s apparent attempt to protect the campaign by investigating Russia’s efforts quietly is now being weaponized against it. In short, this entails identifying foreign intelligence officers and their network of agents uncovering their motives and methods and ultimately rendering their operations ineffective - either by clandestinely thwarting them (say, by feeding back misinformation or “flipping” their sources into double agents) or by exposing them. Rather than trying to find evidence of a crime, the FBI’s counterintelligence goal is to identify, monitor and neutralize foreign intelligence activity in the United States. And relying on a covert source rather than a more intrusive method of gathering information suggests that the FBI may have been acting cautiously - perhaps too cautiously - to protect the campaign, not undermine it,” wrote Asha Rangappa, a “lecturer” at the Jackson Institute for Global Affairs at Yale University and a former FBI agent.Īs a former FBI counterintelligence agent, I know what Trump apparently does not: Counterintelligence investigations have a different purpose than their criminal counterparts. The investigation started out as a counterintelligence probe, not a criminal one. “Trump and his backers are wrong about what it means that the FBI reportedly was using a confidential source to gather information early in its investigation of possible campaign ties to Russia. They used one to protect him,” read the Post’s headline. “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |